Visit prompt's column >>

PROMPTHome Page

Advocatus Diaboli
Add To Watchlist
Articles Posted: 115; Links Seeded: 1506
Member Since: 1/2006Last Seen: 11/28/2009

Small vs Large Business - The Real Engine of the Economy

advertisement

It has been widely accepted as of late that small businesses are the "fuel of the economy", that which keeps the economy running. It is true that there are many arguments in favour of this; however, when one looks at the rebuttals for the arguments on the small business side, the notion of such businesses fuelling the economy becomes highly debatable. As written in Economics Now – Analyzing Current Issues:

"Small businesses, by virtue of their numbers, constitute the engine that fuels the Canadian economy. Big businesses, each of which employs thousands of Canadians, have a great deal of political influence. Think of them as the wheel that steers the national economy in a given direction."

While it is true that the number of small businesses heavily outsize the number of big businesses, one must wonder how this constitutes them being the 'engine' as the book mentions. Yes, small businesses generally specialize in their operations in order to maintain a level of competitiveness against the countless other small businesses in their market, which allows them to be much more sensitive to change in the economy, but this isn't what makes changes and trends have the same impact as they do when the big business side changes for the market.

When there is a change in a market, the small businesses tend to hype up the change and do quite well financially, but once a big business entity meets the changing winds, they have the power to dominate the market regardless of the time difference it took to adapt – the small businesses just don't have the scale of operations needed to exploit a market.

This can be seen with innovation, something which is credited largely to small business. It is argued that the "hottest and latest" trends come from small businesses, therefore meaning that they are a stronger force in the economy; however, there is a good reason as to why the latest trends come from small businesses, and that is because small businesses generally have two options coming into a market:

  1. Imitation – small businesses taking this path tend to go along with the current market trends, as it is the tried and true method and goes along with the idea of "safety in numbers".
  2. Innovation – small businesses on this path are what really prompts the creation of new trends in the market, as these businesses go out on a limb with an idea and hope for the best.

Now all businesses, both big and small, are able to choose one of these paths; however, there is not much use for a big business to take the second. It is common knowledge that small businesses are more effective, and big businesses are somewhat cantankerous in the light of change. So if a big business wants to try something new and take a risk, they put a lot more on the line then a small business does.

A big business is responsible for so many people, so much money, and such a large part of the economy, that taking a big risk is in a lot of sense unmoral and just not a wise decision. For a small business, it is the opposite – they could take the imitation path and if done right earn a steady but low profit, or they can go for the big dollars and try innovation.

From viewing the economy in this light, it becomes apparent that most small businesses are all racing for the fame of being innovators, while they are huge risks for the success of the business itself. Once a small company does find that niche in the market for a new product or idea, they become the top dog until the big businesses move slowly into the market themselves. Once they do, they are able to use their size and influence in order to command control of the market, and the small businesses are back to their original two options of imitation or innovation.

The proof behind this theory is that when a small business gains their acclaim and status from being innovative, they are eventually put under extreme amounts of pressure from the larger and more powerful businesses. This puts them in a tough decision – they can continue being a small business, taking the risks of being innovative, they can continue in the trend they have created and coast along on their initial success, or they can grow in size and enter other markets in order to maintain the size (which comes with the success they earn) they have achieved.

This puts it into an entirely different light, and brings us back to the original quote from Economics Now – are small businesses really the engine of the economy whilst the big businesses are the wheels, leading the market in whichever direction it chooses? It now seems apparent that it is the small businesses which lead the economy in its trends, and the big businesses which really keep it going through the trends. Remember that it is extremely difficult for a small business to gain success through innovation without it in itself becoming a big business.

  • 9 Votes
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top

Published to:

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
4.6
0.5
{"commentId":207646,"authorDomain":"ejronin"}

This is completely true in my experience in the retail world AND working for both small business, attempting to open my own business and working for a corporate chain.

Small business has no choice but to imitate because creating a market is VERY risky. Most small businesses don't last more than 5 years. My fathers lasted for 15, mine... well... I had a rock solid business plan, but I lacked investors and the idea of having to buy a product in bulk to stock with which has zero guarantee to sell quickly changed my mind as to the business I wanted to run (A video game store... more to it, but that is neither here nor there).

Big business DOES go whatever direction it wants to go because people are more likely to buy a brand rather than a product. This is evidenced with things like Sony, Apple, Microsoft, Pioneer, Alpine, GE, Kenmore, De Walt, Milwaukee, Budweiser, Coke, Nike, Hummer, Porche, Toyota, and Intel.... not every product they sell is the best in its field, but even the worst idea and product each of these companies sell will outsell the best product of a small business. Some of this has to do with the company reach and presence, and the rest of it has to do with the brand.

{"commentId":207646,"threadId":"22606","contentId":"287435","authorDomain":"ejronin"}
    Reply#1 - Sun Jul 16, 2006 4:01 AM EDT
    {"commentId":359819,"authorDomain":"riki"}

    This is excellent information where can I fiind more like it on the same topic?

    {"commentId":359819,"threadId":"22606","contentId":"287435","authorDomain":"riki"}
      Reply#2 - Thu Nov 2, 2006 7:45 PM EST
      {"commentId":359995,"authorDomain":"prompt"}

      I wrote this based largely on knowledge I have collected over my entire business and economic education, so I couldn't point you in a single direction.

      Do you have a specific interest you would like to know more on?

      {"commentId":359995,"threadId":"22606","contentId":"287435","authorDomain":"prompt"}
        #2.1 - Thu Nov 2, 2006 9:51 PM EST
        Reply
        {"commentId":360019,"authorDomain":"scientificblog"}

        I agree that 'small business' hype tends to be exaggerated, even in America, for the simple fact that people doing these studies leave out the government. Even the USA, home of capitalism has 50% of its revenue controlled by the government, so big and small business are left fighting for the remaining 50%.

        {"commentId":360019,"threadId":"22606","contentId":"287435","authorDomain":"scientificblog"}
          Reply#3 - Thu Nov 2, 2006 10:15 PM EST
          {"commentId":360370,"authorDomain":"farmer"}

          Very good Jon, I would like to point out that once small business was the norm. Today, it is big business setting the pace. The big reason is economies of scale. Other reasons include the ability to hire only top notch people. The ability to influence suppliers and supportive elements even government.

          I would like to point to a comment by Shawn Gordon:

          Small business has no choice but to imitate because creating a market is VERY risky.

          Small business except in crafts and arts or a few other peculiar areas, does not lend itself to creating markets. Where small business can excel is in finding markets yet untouched by big business and catering to them.

          {"commentId":360370,"threadId":"22606","contentId":"287435","authorDomain":"farmer"}
          • 2 votes
          Reply#4 - Fri Nov 3, 2006 5:49 AM EST
          {"commentId":360812,"authorDomain":"scientificblog"}

          Mr. Oldfogey ( just by the seniority of your name alone I have to be more polite - I am convinced my mother will teleport to the front of my desk and slap me if I just called you 'oldfogey' ) ... I am not sure what you mean.

          In new markets there are no big companies because CEOs do not think that way. Microsoft was very late in the browser market. Sony did not start out making TVs. Small companies created those market. Henry Ford revolutionized automobiles but wasn't even the first 25 in that market, etc.

          Or am I reading your statement incorrectly?

          {"commentId":360812,"threadId":"22606","contentId":"287435","authorDomain":"scientificblog"}
          • 2 votes
          Reply#5 - Fri Nov 3, 2006 11:17 AM EST
          {"commentId":361475,"authorDomain":"farmer"}

          Cash, I was just supporting Jon's article and viewpoint, small business once drove the entire economy, that is no longer true. I was pointing out that small business was dependent on finding new markets and filling them quickly. Once big business sees the small one succeed it will tend to force the smaller one out.

          I have recently had an epiphany about Walmart. You may see an article from me soon if someone else doesn't cover my idea sooner.

          {"commentId":361475,"threadId":"22606","contentId":"287435","authorDomain":"farmer"}
          • 1 vote
          Reply#6 - Fri Nov 3, 2006 3:56 PM EST
          {"commentId":361668,"authorDomain":"scientificblog"}

          Mr. Oldfogey, okay, that's why I was asking for the clarification. I agree that in a mature market consolidation is possible, but Starbucks has 12K stores and I don't see a dearth of small coffee shops. I live in silicon valley and I can't spit without hitting a Web 2.0 company so Google and Microsoft haven't killed software.

          I look forward to the Wal-Mart article.

          {"commentId":361668,"threadId":"22606","contentId":"287435","authorDomain":"scientificblog"}
          • 1 vote
          Reply#7 - Fri Nov 3, 2006 5:31 PM EST
          {"canLink":false,"threadId":"22606","isPrivate":false}
          Leave a Comment:
          You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
          As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
          {"threadId":"22606","contentId":"287435"}
          Start TrackingStart Tracking
          Stop TrackingStop Tracking