
A judge has ordered Paris Hilton returned to jail to serve out her 45-day sentence for a parole violation in a reckless driving case.
She was taken from court screaming.
"It's not right!" shouted the weeping Hilton. "Mom!" she called out to her mother in the audience.
Earlier, a crying Hilton was taken to court in a police car Friday for a hearing on her early release from jail.
I really don't have much against Paris - she is rich, good looking, and irresponsible. I'm glad though that she has been made to serve out the rest of her sentence. Celebrities shouldn't be above the law and the judge has made sure of that in this case.
Yeah, she is annoying..sure...but I have nothing against her, or her right to act like spoiled rich kid...after all, she IS a spoiled rich kid. But that doesn't put her above the law, and thankfully for once that seems to be holding true.
I disagree. Sauer and the local DA, not to mention our irresponsible media, have had the ability to unfairly single her out.
I did have something to laugh about before I edited :)
I don't think they singled her out. I think she did. She does things to stay in the media, not this mind you, but other things. The fact that the media keeps tabs on her backfired here.
Popular doesn't say good or bad, just popularity. This time it caught up to her.
I'm sorry--good looking? She's a horse in foundation!
Aw, somebody is jealous my compliments have fallen upon another woman.
I really don't have much against Paris - she is rich, good looking, and irresponsible.
I'll agree with Stolte-sawa. She looks like ass without the magic of make-up. For some reason I can't find women with gobs of make up attractive, even if it's on correctly. Then again, there is that whole total spastic retard quality of Hilton that enhances the flaccidity factor she creates.
In any event, I find it interesting that this "unspecified medical condition" is taken seriously by anyone except her over paid lawyers. I mean, I guess the difference between her and an alcoholic would be what - specification of the medical condition? So then would she have had to come back to jail once they figured out what her medical condition was had that excuse actually worked?
Seriously, she's 26 and irrespective of her social or financial status it's about damn time she learned responsibility and that actions have reactions... though I doubt she'll think about anything other than how much it is unfair for her to be in jail - so the whole point of the sentence
No, it's time she hired a driver. Then she can continue doing all the stupid @!$%# she wants.
Then she can continue doing all the stupid @!$%# she wants.
But she wants to drive!...!!!!! Drunk!
With this girl, nothing's ever enough.
"It's not right!"
I am rich and marginally hot! Why should I be held to the same standards as everyone else? It's not fair!
The fact that she called out to her mother says it all--she is used to being treated like a princess with no rules, no expectation that she behave within the law.
Quote
By Roger Friedman
"If they couldn't get Simpson, Jackson or Blake, and if they can't get Spector, they're going to get Paris Hilton to prove a point.
It's too funny. But that's California, and Los Angeles, specifically.
You know what guys? Leave her alone already. Pick on someone your own size."
snip
Thanks Brandon! Hopefully, we'll properly inform the right people. This Judge Sauer shouldn't have been on the bench! The LA prosecutor responsible shouldn't have been elected either because he's violating the constitution with this injustice, and I'm serious.
How exactly is he violating the constitution?
This woman got a DUI, then drove on a suspended license in blatant disregard of the law threatening the lives of innocent civilians as it may be. She could have killed people. Why should that not be punished?
It violates Californa's and the federal constitutions because of its unfairness. As I've repeated over and over, Michelle Rodriguez, for example, was convicted of two DUIs, a hit and run, and violation of probation but only served like 5 minutes. Paris wasn't even convicted of a DUI but reckless driving. It's a double standard.
Not all celebrities are created - or treated - equally?
Do I think it's fair that Michelle Rodriguez got off easy? No. Do I think people would seriously take heed if this were the sentence for DUIs? I do. DUIs account for 39% of the traffic-related deaths in the country.
@ Vincent
It violates Californa's and the federal constitutions because of its unfairness. As I've repeated over and over, Michelle Rodriguez, for example, was convicted of two DUIs, a hit and run, and violation of probation but only served like 5 minutes. Paris wasn't even convicted of a DUI but reckless driving. It's a double standard.
So by letting Paris slide on this, then we destroy the double standard and all celebrities can look forward to being treated with he same negligence as Rodriguez? No. You've got to start fixing it somewhere.
I really don't see how this is against Federal constitutions.
What, calling me on the typo or on the concept?
both
I'll quote Frederick Douglass from his famous speech, "What to the Slave Is the Fourth of July?" Written way back in 1852, and I hope that literacy rates have improved since then, Douglass says to his ante-bellum audience:
Ex-Vice President Dallas tells us that the constitution is an object to which no American mind can be too devoted. He further says, the constitution in its words is plain and intelligible, and is meant for the home-bred, unsophisticated understandings of our fellow-citizens...
He goes on to further justify citizens' opinions of the document with further authority, "esteemed... sound lawyers..." and also politicians such as Senator Breese.
and you are going where with that? Seriously.
I hope that literacy rates have improved since then
...
He further says, the constitution in its words is plain and intelligible, and is meant for the home-bred, unsophisticated understandings of our fellow-citizens...
yet so many people have a problem understanding what it really says, despite how plain and intellible it is.
Still... where exactly are you going with your point? You've equated Socrates with Paris and prosecution, and now an excerpt of a Frederick Douglas speech somehow has a bearing. You've lost me.
Didn't you respond that you were objecting to my comment and mistake about the federal constitution (and California's BTW, which can only provide more rights to the individual)? Whether you want to listen seems the issue, not your attack that "You've lost me."
Not really... forget it.
Awesome. My faith in this tiny sliver of our justice system is restored.
I have to say that I am pleasantly surprised.
I had written this off as another example of preferential treatment for the rich and famous. Although in her case it should really only be rich. She is famous for being famous I guess.
If she's sick, she can go to the prison infirmary as the other inmates do.
I have to admit I am a wee bit gleeful at the image of her being carted off, yelling.
Well, please reconsider :) LOL!
Gee. I hear her lawyer is going to evoke the writ of habeas corpus on her behalf. Too bad the prisoners in Gitmo aren't given the same privilege.
Paris Hilton has no sympathy from me. She's essentially a spoiled, rich kid who thought she was above the law and expected to be treated preferentially because of the media hype that surrounds her.
I'm still trying to figure out what her appeal is. She's not particularly attractive, she's not nice, she has no talent and she doesn't DO anything. Is her wealth her only selling point?
Frankly, I'm stumped. I think someone should make her live in the 'Hood for a decade or so. Give her an opportunity to discover how the other half lives.
Wasn't that the purpose of their reality show, "The Simple Life?"
If that is the case, it most certainly didn't work. And I think the point was more in making fun of how the other half live, not in learning anything from how the other half lived.
Agreed. I think it's a lost cause. A lot of people speculated that the experience of jail would fundamentally change her and reshape her outlook on life. Given this afternoon's spectacle, I guess not.
She's not sick. A psychiatrist has spoken with her and claims she's at the edge of a nervous breakdown.
Too goddamn bad. She wouldn't be at the edge of a nervous breakdown if she had some moral fiber. Maybe a little nervous breakdown will give her some.
This reminds me of an article that I think I read on Newsvine some time ago about the number of celebs who take time out for "exhaustion."
The whole point of the article is that there isn't a medical condition that is labeled exhaustion at all, and if I remember right, it's usually a load of crap. Most of us would love to take a few days off from work due to "exhaustion" and most of us don't have it as easy as some of these celebs.
poor little rich snot can't do her drugs of choice or drink in jail. I'm thinking that is her "medical condition" - addiction.
i might be on the verge of a nervous breakdown too if i had to go to jail. only i would go to a real one, not an upscale, special jail for celebrities.
I sincerely hope the psychiatrist didn't use the term "nervous breakdown"
I'd bet she said she was suicidal and that's why they let her go home.
addiction, she's best off under medical supervision, Jail's as good as anywhere if she's that strung out.
I think everyone could say they feel on the verge of a nervous breakdown sometimes - i 'm sure none of us would get any get out of jail free card.
It is the PRINCIPLE of the thing!
I would think anyone would be on the verge of a nervous breakdown if they were going to get locked up. funny thing is, she was at MTV awards the night before. It must have just dawned on her that it was really going to happen. I had nothing against her myself, and even enjoyed her daftness to a large extent BUT calling the judge to ask if she could attend the hearing by phone from her house arrest was the last straw.
From WWTDD.com
sexy Heather:
My friend's brother (who works with [Sheriff Lee] Baca's assistant sheriffs) told me that Paris was released due to a severe, "stress-induced" herpes outbreak. He also said that he heard that the blisters had apparently spread to her anus and had taken on abcess-like features that required more serious medical attention. Thus, after taking into account jail overcrowding, the increasing liability that Paris presents, and Paris's lesions, all things weighed in favor of her being put on home confinement.
may or may not be true.
Then I say let everybody in the Big House recuperate at home when their hemorrhoids are acting up.
I sure hope that this is the start of a new era for the California justice system. Hopefully they're using her as an example as to what will happen if you're famous and you break the law: you're going to be given the same right to defend yourself, and if you're found guilty, you're going to be punished accordingly...just like everybody else.
I do have a sinking feeling that we'll be going through something like this in another 5 days though.
And if it's not another Paris addendum, it'll be about Lindsey, Britney, or Nicole. Because that's what passes for headline news today in the USA. (Especially in California.)
I'm afraid that people like Paris, Britney and Lindsey hog the headline news no matter where you live in America.
AOL's "Top News" listing is always citing their antics as media-worthy. What a depressing commentary on our nation's priorities . . .
I'm afraid that people like Paris, Britney and Lindsey hog the headline news no matter where you live in America.
AOL's "Top News" listing is always citing their antics as media-worthy. What a depressing commentary on our nation's priorities . . .
We're not alone. It's listed under "Other top stories" on the front page of the BBC website as well...
I agree, but criminals get away with stuff all of the time. It's not just celebrities, nor should it be.
Now let's properly investigate the Sheriff's Department to see how this occurred to begin with.
I've been wondering if the sheriff was bribed.
I've been wondering if the sheriff was bribed.
As was I
Wait - there's something wrong with the justice system?
I would have never guessed....
Yeah, bribed... Or... perhaps he spent a night in Paris....
Or... perhaps he spent a night in Paris...
And couldn't stand the sight of her after that?
Yeah, bribed... Or... perhaps he spent a night in Paris....
Well, if that's the case, there just has to be a video of it floating around the Internet, right?
Los Angeles, CA, isn't Alburqurque in around 2004-2005, nor is it Georgia. The corruption's with Judge Sauer and LA City Attorney Rocky Delgadillo's office, if anywhere, their disregard of the state and federal constitution's Fifth Amendment on fairness. Our media's also behaving in its usually iressponsible fashion and those accepting imporper information and/or the emotion of schadenfreude.
But you agree that Paris Hilton herself is not above the law, and that the punishment given for violation of probation is not unfair. If I were to violate my hypothetical probation I would expect to be served with jail time irrespective of what judge I was in front of.
While violation of probation sentences are likely to vary state to state, I'm fairly certain that every state has jail time attached to the failure to comply with the circumstances of said probation.
It seems that you're hinging on saying that Paris has no reason to be in jail on the grounds of an unfair judge. If so, fine, but the punishment given I see as fair.
Hilton's twisted jailhouse saga began September 7, when she failed a sobriety test after police saw her weaving down a street in her Mercedes-Benz on what she said was a late-night hamburger run. (Watch how drunken driving is the bane of celebrities Video)
She pleaded no contest to reckless driving and was sentenced to 36 months' probation, alcohol education and $1,500 in fines. In the months that followed she was stopped twice while driving on a suspended license. The second stop landed her in Sauer's courtroom.
So Hilton plead 'no contest'. 'No contest' isn't 'pleading the 5th'. "Pleading the 5th" is a right, whereas no contest (nolo contendere) is not. A nolo plea has the same effect as a guilty plea.
A conviction arising from a nolo plea is subject to any and all penalties, fines, and forfeitures of a conviction from a guilty plea, and can be considered as an aggravating factor in future criminal actions. However, unlike a guilty plea, a defendant may not be required to allocute the charges, and the conviction may be used to establish neither negligence per se, malice, nor whether the acts were committed at all, in later civil proceedings related to the same set of facts as the criminal prosecution.
I'm not out to delight in the misfortune of Hilton, but at the same time I'm not going to hope and wish her luck simply because it's noble or to set a balance in the social cluster that sits back, points and laughs at her. Personally, I give a rat's ass about Paris Hilton (though I do find it funny to listen to her try and make a complete sentence). It's not that who she is effects my attitude for her, I just loathe people who choose to remain stupid and delight in their downfall regardless of who, where, and how. Equal opportunity is like that...
Good. Let's hope it sticks this time.
Keeping this spoiled brat in jail may make her realize that she must turn her life around and take responsibilities for her idiotic actions. Keep her there for the entire 45 days without any early release is what she deserves! IMO, she deserves more.
Yeah, well as I said in the other clipping from Newsvine on this topic, society would still put Socrates to death if it had the chance.
Yeah, well as I said in the other clipping from Newsvine on this topic, society would still put Socrates to death if it had the chance.
So now we are comparing Paris to Socrates? Socrates was one of the greatest minds this world has ever seen; Paris...well she's not really one of the greatest anything this world has ever seen. Dude you are seriously off your rocker.
Sectim42:
I've requested your comment be removed. It's libelous, an ad hominem, a flame war. You crossed the line.
Vincent, methinks you need to calm down, if you are upset about this little remark, you are going to have a hard time here on a social news site. His remark was tame compared to some of the stuff I see around here. So just calm down, I dont think he crossed the line at all, unless you think disagreeing with you is crossing the line, in which case you dont need to be here in the first place.
Take Phaedrus' word for it. You may need a tad thicker skin around here.
Calvin knows, don't ya Calvin? ha ha. If I didn't have a thick skin, I would left newsvine running and crying a long time ago. Hell, just this past week, I've been told to "@!$%# off" more times than Tony Soprano.
Controls didn't work with the exclamation point, but I've ignored him by going to his page and doing it. What about the bugs?
Falsely accusing someone of being sick is libel. You want to allow that on Newsvine along with the bugs and violations of the "honor code" I see?
Wow...
You all are going to feel bad when she really does have a mental breakdown and commits suicide or shivvs her cell mate. Actually, that second option would be awesome.
I posted this is another article, but this one seems to be the "winner" in the discussion race.
Here's my problem with the whole thing:
She never has had to learn responsibility for her actions
Now I say this as I have seen this in my own family. A close family member of mine got into a world of trouble in high school. Drugs, minor consumption, theft, etc... Now because another family member of mine is a "pretty powerful" attorney in the area, and another family member was a "pretty powerful" politician, my "first" family member got very lenient sentences that didn't teach her anything.
This is what parents - like Kathy Hilton - don't realize. Kids need consequences, not enablers. And if we deprive kids of consequences, they don't learn from their mistakes. Paris has never had to learn from any of her mistakes and she sure isn't now either. The result is a 26-year old girl (and I really mean girl) not capable of taking care of herself.
I'm way beyond concern for her learning anything. That went out the window two episodes into "the simple life" when it became clear that it wasn't really a reality show so much as a loosely scripted sitcom.
I just want to see her punished so I can believe in justice.
I can't believe she is 26 years old. How pathetic!!!!
Since when do people only do the time, if they can handle it. I heard a joke on XM last nite about this, I think it was on ABC News, a guy called in with this little joke:
A guy was sentenced to 3 months in jail for violating probation.
They guy was visibly upset and said that he wasn't able to do 3 months.
The judge says, "Weeelll, do what you can."
I am extremely happy that she was put back in jail, let her do the time just like everyone else who breaks the law.
Did anyone see her get roasted on the MTV Move awards just 3 days before she first reported to jail, by Sarah Silverman? Oh, it was priceless!! Sarah said that Paris was going to jail, and then the camera panned to Paris in the audience, trying her best to smile, but she looked on the verge of tears. Sarah looks at her and says, "Oh, honey!" lol Then she says, "You know she is going to get special treatment. I heard they are going to paint the bars of her cell to look like penises so she will feel more at home." The audience laughs hysterically, the camera pans to Paris again, looking to be on the verge of pulling out a shotgun and going ape@!$%#, then Sarah tops it off with this,"I'm just afraid she's gonna break her teeth on those things."
One last thing, Paris is a disgusting excuse for a human being, she is only famous because of her name and because of her sex video. She does nothing constructive with her life, if she wasn't so rich, she'd be a leach off of society, actually she is a leach off of society and her parents. And she's not even that good looking. I don't think she is pretty at all. When I was in school, we called girls like her "Scuz buckets"
Can you tell that I have nothing but contempt for this excuse for a girl? She needs a very rude awakening, and I don't care if she does have a nervous breakdown in jail.
Welcome to the real @!$%#ing world, princess!!!
No, I think she was roasted the night that she checked herself into jail. She was asked if she was going to any after parties, and she said no. Then, that night, there was video footage of her going to the prison (still with her MTV movie award makeup and hair extensions).
I would think being called "princess" would be better than being called "a rabble rouser." However, "a disgusting excuse for a human being"? Who are you to call her that?
Who am I to call her that? Who are you to ask me who I am to call her that? I am frickin' Phaedrus, and I am entitled to my opinions, and I stand by my assertion that she is a disgusting excuse for a human being? Don't like it? I don't really care.
Lots of anger directed at Paris Hilton, but not all of it for the right reasons methinks.
She can't help being born into wealth and living the life she does. She hasn't been taught to do anything useful, so she has fun for a living. Not admirable but not a crime.
My concern is for her drunk driving. Every time a drunk gets behind the wheel of a car, they endanger my children's lives. This would have been far more egregious if it was a tearful Paris apologizing to the family of a dead victim.
The message being sent isn't 'You're just like the rest of us rabble', or shouldn't be. The message is, Lindsay, Brittney, Nicole and all Kennedys should not ever, ever drive while under the influence.
There is way too much media scrutiny on this matter. Watching CNN today filming the whole "saga" as they called it was disgusting. The reporter at the courthouse seemed way to emotional about the what was happening.
The media seems to put too much weight on stuff like this and it seems wrong. I can't imagine what a celebrity goes through when something like this happens. It seems like people have vengeance against her because she is rich.. especially reporters. They seem to want this to happen and salivate like dogs when the hammer comes down on celebs. Disgusting!
These comments are why I love Newsvine;
Wasn't her time reduced to 21 days? and now it seems to have been restored to the full 45 days am I the only one who caught that?
Cant wait for her book, Drunk and Befuddled of course she will earn millions for TV and personal viewings. Its good to be a spoilt rich kid
The thing I can't get over is the way she is acting about 20 days in jail!
She is acting like she is going to have to serve a life sentence!!!
I would hate to have to go through it, but one would think that 20 days is doable for almost anyone. It is barely over two weeks....
yea, it's jail too, not prison, it's not like she is gonna be made some girl's "Butch".
She can't help being born into wealth and living the life she does
I'm sorry but I just can't buy that. By this logic anyone born into a family of millionaires gets extra sympathy points and perhaps leniancy in the law?
I can see it now:
Officer: "Miss, did you realize you were driving drunk and are naked and are throwing money out the window?"
Rich spoiled celebrity: "But officer I was born into this lifestyle."
Officer: "Oh! Well, in that case.... hmm, do you have any I.D.?"
Celebrity pouts.
Officer: "Oh, wait, I recognize you now from your sex tapes and appearances on tv. You're free to go."
The lady has been found guilty of offences warranting 45 days in jail. When is George W. Bush going to be dragged weeping and screaming to jail for the following ACTUALLY DEADLY crimes: post-invasion excess deaths in the Occupied Iraqi and Afghan Territories totalling 1.0 million and 2.4 million, respectively; post-invasion under-5 infant deaths in the Occupied Iraqi and Afghan Territories totalling 0.5 million and 1.9 million, respectively; 140,000 avoidable under-5 American infant deaths due to warped Bush priorities ; 50,000 post-2001 American opiate drug-related deaths due to Bush restoration of the Taliban-destroyed Afghan opium industry; 210,000 American gun-deaths so far under the pro-Gun Bush Administration; 3.500 American soldiers killed in Bush's War on Terror (actually a cowardly, racist and corrupt War on Women and Children); an accrual cost of his wars totalling $2.5 trillion (according to US Economics Nobel laureate Professor Joseph Stiglitz) (see: link )?
I knew ole' G.W. would get pulled into this eventually, never fails.
Gideon, drunken driving IS an actually deadly crime, as you put it.
I knew ole' G.W. would get pulled into this eventually, never fails.
My sentiments exactly. It really goes to show the immaturity of the poster to bring totally unrelated elements into a discussion to vindicate one's negative feelings towards some political slant.
What does the war have to do with Paris? I'd be surprised if Paris even knows there's a war going on
Well, I do see his point in that the hype about Paris seems like a distraction from far, far more serious matters. Why is it so wrong (and "immature") to compare-
Oooh look! Paris is on the news again!
Drunk driving is a POTENTIALLY deadly crime; Bush and his confreres (notably Dr Rice, aka Dr Death) are complicit in ACTUAL deadly crimes with millions of ACTUAL VICTIMS (mostly Women and Children).
Take it to another article, Gideon. Threadjacking at every opportunity doesn't help your cause at all...
Oh boo hoo, you have to go to county jail for a few weeks (if that). Screaming in the courtroom? Lay off the drama cupcake. Your millions of un-earned dollars that daddy gave you will still be there when you get back.
Now if she were just sentenced to 30 years in an actual hardcore prison, that might warrant the drama (and all the media attention), but c'mon....
Agreed.
We are talking 20 days tops... She is acting like she got sentenced to life...
Pathetic!
She deserves to do her time in jail. If not for her crime then to teach her a life lesson and for her to grow the feck up!
I'd worry about my pets.
Justice prevails.
Well, there's Virginia Tech happening; the conspirators of 9/ 11 are still at large; a gun law debate still far from over; Point being the society are still far from perfect..
So why single out Ms. Hilton. Personally, I think I quite fancy her and take her to quite a smart woman. And I don't know what kind of cheap thrill people are deriving from seeing her being dragged out. Paris Hilton, in her own very way, adds to the mystique of the American dream and the brand equity of America as a country abroad, so I would think America would be better to leave her at her own thing. More people would rather agree with what Ms. Hilton does, than they would with your president.
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |